Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with gemma 3n E2B it and Mistral Small 4, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

gemma 3n E2B it vs Mistral Small 4

Live dataset updated 9/15/2026, 9:19:37 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of gemma 3n E2B it and Mistral Small 4
Field
Mistral Small 4

Mistral AI

ModelCap position#176#117
Index score22.140.7
EvidenceInheritedfinetune of google/gemma-3n-E4B-it · finetune (100%)Measured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.15
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.60
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—262K
Providers02
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • gemma 3n E2B it is #176; Mistral Small 4 is #117 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 22.1 for gemma 3n E2B it and 40.7 for Mistral Small 4. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: gemma 3n E2B it is Inherited; Mistral Small 4 is Measured.
  • Weight access differs: gemma 3n E2B it is gated; Mistral Small 4 is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for gemma 3n E2B it and 2 for Mistral Small 4.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.