Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 3 4B and gemma 3n E4B it, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 3 4B vs gemma 3n E4B it

Live dataset updated 11/6/2026, 8:49:50 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 3 4B and gemma 3n E4B it
Field
ModelCap position#255#238
Index score26.030.2
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1M$0.05Unavailable
Output / 1M$0.10Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context131K33K
Providers20
Weight accessGated accessGated access

Decision facts

  • Gemma 3 4B is #255; gemma 3n E4B it is #238 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 26.0 for Gemma 3 4B and 30.2 for gemma 3n E4B it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Published context is 131,072 tokens for Gemma 3 4B and 32,768 for gemma 3n E4B it.
  • ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for Gemma 3 4B and 0 for gemma 3n E4B it.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.