Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 3 27B and gemma 3n E4B it, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 3 27B vs gemma 3n E4B it

Live dataset updated 11/7/2026, 2:00:08 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 3 27B and gemma 3n E4B it
Field
ModelCap position#152#238
Index score42.630.2
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1M$0.08Unavailable
Output / 1M$0.35Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context131K33K
Providers40
Weight accessGated accessGated access

Decision facts

  • Gemma 3 27B is #152; gemma 3n E4B it is #238 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 42.6 for Gemma 3 27B and 30.2 for gemma 3n E4B it. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Published context is 131,072 tokens for Gemma 3 27B and 32,768 for gemma 3n E4B it.
  • ModelCap currently lists 4 providers for Gemma 3 27B and 0 for gemma 3n E4B it.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.