Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with gemma 2 9b it and Gemma 4 31B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

gemma 2 9b it vs Gemma 4 31B

Live dataset updated 11/6/2026, 8:49:50 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of gemma 2 9b it and Gemma 4 31B
Field
ModelCap position#289#37
Index score19.771.9
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.20
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.40
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—262K
Providers016
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • gemma 2 9b it is #289; Gemma 4 31B is #37 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 19.7 for gemma 2 9b it and 71.9 for Gemma 4 31B. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Weight access differs: gemma 2 9b it is gated; Gemma 4 31B is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for gemma 2 9b it and 16 for Gemma 4 31B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.