Compare AI models

Decision facts

• Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is #34; Gemma 4 31B is #37 on the same current language board.
• Index scores are 72.8 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 71.9 for Gemma 4 31B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
• Both positions use Measured evidence.
• Listed output price per 1M tokens is $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and $0.40 for Gemma 4 31B. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.85 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite versus $0.60 for Gemma 4 31B. Gemma 4 31B costs 67.6% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
• Published context is 1,048,576 tokens for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 262,144 for Gemma 4 31B.
• Weight access differs: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is none; Gemma 4 31B is open.
• ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 15 for Gemma 4 31B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.