Compare AI models

Decision facts

• Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is #33; Gemma 3 27B is #127 on the same current language board.
• Index scores are 72.2 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 43.7 for Gemma 3 27B. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
• Both positions use Measured evidence.
• Listed output price per 1M tokens is $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and $0.45 for Gemma 3 27B. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.85 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite versus $0.39 for Gemma 3 27B. Gemma 3 27B costs 79.2% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
• Published context is 1,048,576 tokens for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 131,072 for Gemma 3 27B.
• Weight access differs: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is none; Gemma 3 27B is gated.
• ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 4 for Gemma 3 27B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.