Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and DeepSeek V3.2, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs DeepSeek V3.2
Live dataset updated 11/7/2026, 12:54:46 AM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus DeepSeek | DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #91 | #82 |
| Index score | 57.9 | 60.6 |
| Evidence | Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards | Measured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards |
| Input / 1M | $0.27 | $0.26 |
| Output / 1M | $1.00 | $0.38 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 164K | 164K |
| Providers | 1 | 7 |
| Weight access | Open weights | Open weights |
Decision facts
- DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is #91; DeepSeek V3.2 is #82 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 57.9 for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and 60.6 for DeepSeek V3.2. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Both positions use Measured evidence.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $1.00 for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and $0.38 for DeepSeek V3.2. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.04 for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus versus $0.71 for DeepSeek V3.2. DeepSeek V3.2 costs 31.7% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 163,840 tokens for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and 163,840 for DeepSeek V3.2.
- ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and 7 for DeepSeek V3.2.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5#3 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Argon#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Wonder#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Wonder#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Muse Wonder#5 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 4 Argon#6 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Wonder#6 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6.1 Sol#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Wonder vs GPT-6.1 Sol#4 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#5 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol#6 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview#1 vs #10 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemini 4 Argon#10 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview#3 vs #10 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.