Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and DeepSeek V3.2, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs DeepSeek V3.2
Live dataset updated 9/22/2026, 9:31:46 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus DeepSeek | DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #71 | #61 |
| Index score | 61.1 | 63.4 |
| Evidence | Measured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards | Measured4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards |
| Input / 1M | $0.27 | $0.269 |
| Output / 1M | $1.00 | $0.40 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 164K | 164K |
| Providers | 4 | 15 |
| Weight access | Open weights | Open weights |
Decision facts
- DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is #71; DeepSeek V3.2 is #61 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 61.1 for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and 63.4 for DeepSeek V3.2. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Both positions use Measured evidence.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $1.00 for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and $0.40 for DeepSeek V3.2. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.04 for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus versus $0.74 for DeepSeek V3.2. DeepSeek V3.2 costs 29.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 163,840 tokens for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and 163,840 for DeepSeek V3.2.
- ModelCap currently lists 4 providers for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and 15 for DeepSeek V3.2.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5#3 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Sol#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.7#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Sol vs Grok 4.7#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.7#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Grok 4.7#6 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs GPT-6 Sol#7 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.7#7 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Sol#8 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.