Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with North Mini Code and Step 3.7 Flash, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
North Mini Code vs Step 3.7 Flash
Live dataset updated 9/19/2026, 11:04:59 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | North Mini Code Cohere | Step 3.7 Flash StepFun |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #98 | #97 |
| Index score | 49.1 | 49.2 |
| Evidence | Measured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board | Estimated3 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (17%); global-corpus-prior over 195 held-out anchors (18%); measured predecessor stepfun/step-3.5-flash less the succession penalty (65%); shrunk 0.8 up toward the measured corpus |
| Input / 1M | Free | $0.20 |
| Output / 1M | Free | $1.15 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 256K | 262K |
| Providers | 1 | 3 |
| Weight access | Open weights | Open weights |
Decision facts
- North Mini Code is #98; Step 3.7 Flash is #97 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 49.1 for North Mini Code and 49.2 for Step 3.7 Flash. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: North Mini Code is Measured; Step 3.7 Flash is Estimated.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0 for North Mini Code and $1.15 for Step 3.7 Flash. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0 for North Mini Code versus $0.97 for Step 3.7 Flash. North Mini Code costs 100.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 256,000 tokens for North Mini Code and 262,144 for Step 3.7 Flash.
- ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for North Mini Code and 3 for Step 3.7 Flash.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#4 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#6 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#2 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra#7 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#7 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-6 Astra#8 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.