Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Command R (08-2024) and Command R+ (08-2024), or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Command R (08-2024) vs Command R+ (08-2024)
Live dataset updated 11/6/2026, 8:49:50 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Command R (08-2024) Cohere | Command R+ (08-2024) Cohere |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #292 | #279 |
| Index score | 17.8 | 22.2 |
| Evidence | Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards | Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards |
| Input / 1M | $0.15 | $2.50 |
| Output / 1M | $0.60 | $10.00 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 128K | 128K |
| Providers | 1 | 1 |
| Weight access | No linked weights | No linked weights |
Decision facts
- Command R (08-2024) is #292; Command R+ (08-2024) is #279 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 17.8 for Command R (08-2024) and 22.2 for Command R+ (08-2024). Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Both positions use Measured evidence.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.60 for Command R (08-2024) and $10.00 for Command R+ (08-2024). For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.60 for Command R (08-2024) versus $10.00 for Command R+ (08-2024). Command R (08-2024) costs 94.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 128,000 tokens for Command R (08-2024) and 128,000 for Command R+ (08-2024).
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5#3 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 4 Argon#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Wonder#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Wonder#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Wonder#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Muse Wonder#5 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 4 Argon#6 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Wonder#6 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6.1 Sol#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Wonder vs GPT-6.1 Sol#4 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#5 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol#6 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview#1 vs #10 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemini 4 Argon#10 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview#3 vs #10 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.