Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Claude Haiku 4.5 and Xing4.0 29B A4B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Xing4.0 29B A4B
Live dataset updated 9/17/2026, 1:44:20 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic | Xing4.0 29B A4B XingChen AGI |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #63 | #60 |
| Index score | 56.4 | 57.8 |
| Evidence | Measured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards | Estimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 197 held-out anchors (16%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 5 rows (85%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 5 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 1.2 toward the measured corpus |
| Input / 1M | $1.00 | Unavailable |
| Output / 1M | $5.00 | Unavailable |
| Pricing status | fresh | unavailable |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Providers | 4 | 0 |
| Weight access | API only | Open weights |
Decision facts
- Claude Haiku 4.5 is #63; Xing4.0 29B A4B is #60 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 56.4 for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 57.8 for Xing4.0 29B A4B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: Claude Haiku 4.5 is Measured; Xing4.0 29B A4B is Estimated.
- Weight access differs: Claude Haiku 4.5 is none; Xing4.0 29B A4B is open.
- ModelCap currently lists 4 providers for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 0 for Xing4.0 29B A4B.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#4 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#6 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#2 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra#7 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#7 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-6 Astra#8 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.