Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Claude Fable 5.1 and Gemini 3.8 Flash, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 2:54:47 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Claude Fable 5.1 and Gemini 3.8 Flash
Field
ModelCap position#2#11
Index score84.176.4
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M$10.00$0.75
Output / 1M$50.00$3.75
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context1M1M
Providers42
Weight accessAPI onlyAPI only

Decision facts

  • Claude Fable 5.1 is #2; Gemini 3.8 Flash is #11 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 84.1 for Claude Fable 5.1 and 76.4 for Gemini 3.8 Flash.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $50.00 for Claude Fable 5.1 and $3.75 for Gemini 3.8 Flash.
  • Published context is 1,000,000 tokens for Claude Fable 5.1 and 1,048,576 for Gemini 3.8 Flash.
  • ModelCap currently lists 4 providers for Claude Fable 5.1 and 2 for Gemini 3.8 Flash.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.