Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (Qwen) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Xiaomi) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 15 September 2026

As of 15 September 2026, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#5 vs #25); MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 6.9× cheaper per output token ($0.87/1M vs $6.00/1M); and MiMo-V2.5-Pro ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Qwen3.8 Max (0902) if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #5 against #25 (83.2 vs 72.7 points).
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 45.4 against 26.4.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 43.1% against 35.7%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Qwen3.8 Max (0902) was listed 3 September 2026, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 22 April 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro if…

  • API cost matters — $0.87/1M output tokens against $6.00/1M, about 6.9× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.435/1M against $2.00/1M.
  • you want to self-host: MiMo-V2.5-Pro ships open weights while Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is api only.
  • you want provider choice — 7 listed API providers against 1.

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
FieldQwen3.8 Max (0902)QwenMiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi
ModelCap Index position#5#25
Index score83.272.7
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$2.00$0.435
Output price / 1M tokens$6.00$0.87
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens131K131K
API providers listed17
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
First listed3 September 202622 April 2026
PublisherQwenXiaomi

Evidence: 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board · 5 public benchmark observations across 5 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Public benchmark boards where Qwen3.8 Max (0902) or MiMo-V2.5-Pro has a published result
BoardQwen3.8 Max (0902)MiMo-V2.5-ProLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15211515–1527Only one result
LMArena AgentLMArena-5.5%-6.5%–-4.5%Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis45.4intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecified26.4intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedQwen3.8 Max (0902)
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis94.2%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="MiMo-V2.5-Pro":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis43.1%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Qwen3.8 Max (0902)":reasoning=true35.7%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="MiMo-V2.5-Pro":reasoning=trueQwen3.8 Max (0902)
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench43.0Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro: common questions

Is Qwen3.8 Max (0902) better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 15 September 2026: #5 against #25. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Qwen3.8 Max (0902) cheaper than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper on output tokens: $0.87/1M against $6.00/1M. Input tokens are $2.00/1M for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and $0.435/1M for MiMo-V2.5-Pro. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $7.00 for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) versus $1.30 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro. MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs 81.4% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Both publish a 1M-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro open-weight models?

Qwen3.8 Max (0902): API only. MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Qwen3.8 Max (0902) and 7 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 15 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further