Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Grok 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Grok 4.6 (xAI) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Xiaomi) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, Grok 4.6 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#16 vs #21); MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 6.9× cheaper per output token ($0.87/1M vs $6.00/1M); MiMo-V2.5-Pro offers the longer context window (1M vs 500K tokens); and MiMo-V2.5-Pro ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Grok 4.6 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #16 against #21 (75.8 vs 72.8 points).
  • LMArena Agent is your yardstick — 3.2% against -5.1%.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 44.4 against 26.4.
  • AA Terminal-Bench 2.1 is your yardstick — 88.4% against 65.2%.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 42.9% against 35.7%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Grok 4.6 was listed 12 August 2026, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 22 April 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro if…

  • API cost matters — $0.87/1M output tokens against $6.00/1M, about 6.9× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.435/1M against $2.00/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 500K.
  • you want to self-host: MiMo-V2.5-Pro ships open weights while Grok 4.6 is api only.
  • you want provider choice — 7 listed API providers against 2.

Grok 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Grok 4.6 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
FieldGrok 4.6xAIMiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi
ModelCap Index position#16#21
Index score75.872.8
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$2.00$0.435
Output price / 1M tokens$6.00$0.87
Context window500K tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens450K131K
API providers listed27
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, FileText
First listed12 August 202622 April 2026
PublisherxAIXiaomi

Evidence: 5 public benchmark observations across 5 boards · 5 public benchmark observations across 5 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Grok 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Public benchmark boards where Grok 4.6 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro has a published result
BoardGrok 4.6MiMo-V2.5-ProLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15201514–1527Only one result
LMArena AgentLMArena3.2%2.1%–4.4%X-High-5.1%-6.1%–-4.1%Grok 4.6
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation67.1%X-HighOnly one result
ARC-AGI-3ARC Prize Foundation2.1%X-HighOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis44.4intelligence-index:v4.3:high26.4intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedGrok 4.6
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis88.4%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Grok 4.6 (high)":reasoning=true65.2%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="MiMo-V2.5-Pro":reasoning=trueGrok 4.6
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis94.2%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="MiMo-V2.5-Pro":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis42.9%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Grok 4.6 (high)":reasoning=true35.7%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="MiMo-V2.5-Pro":reasoning=trueGrok 4.6
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)20.3%17.2%–23.4%Grok Build · HighOnly one result
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench43.0Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Grok 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro: common questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Grok 4.6 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #16 against #21. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Grok 4.6 cheaper than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper on output tokens: $0.87/1M against $6.00/1M. Input tokens are $2.00/1M for Grok 4.6 and $0.435/1M for MiMo-V2.5-Pro. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $7.00 for Grok 4.6 versus $1.30 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro. MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs 81.4% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.6 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 500K.

Which is better for coding, Grok 4.6 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

AA Terminal-Bench 2.1: Grok 4.6 88.4%, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 65.2% — Grok 4.6 leads.

Are Grok 4.6 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro open-weight models?

Grok 4.6: API only. MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Grok 4.6 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for Grok 4.6 and 7 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Grok 4.6 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further