Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (DeepSeek) and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Xiaomi) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#25 vs #26); and MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 2× cheaper per output token ($0.87/1M vs $1.74/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #25 against #26 (73.6 vs 72.8 points).
  • you want provider choice — 19 listed API providers against 7.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 36.3 against 26.4.
  • AA Terminal-Bench 2.1 is your yardstick — 78.7% against 65.2%.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 41.0% against 35.7%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 was listed 12 August 2026, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 22 April 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro if…

  • API cost matters — $0.87/1M output tokens against $1.74/1M, about 2× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.435/1M against $0.579/1M.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1520 against 1505.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
FieldDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeekMiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi
ModelCap Index position#25#26
Index score73.672.8
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.579$0.435
Output price / 1M tokens$1.74$0.87
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens393K131K
API providers listed197
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText
First listed12 August 202622 April 2026
PublisherDeepSeekXiaomi

Evidence: 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards · 5 public benchmark observations across 5 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro has a published result
BoardDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813MiMo-V2.5-ProLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15051490–1519High15201514–1527MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena AgentLMArena-5.1%-6.1%–-4.1%Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation61.3%MaxOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis36.3intelligence-index:v4.3:max26.4intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis78.7%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max)":reasoning=true65.2%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="MiMo-V2.5-Pro":reasoning=trueDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis94.2%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="MiMo-V2.5-Pro":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis41.0%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max)":reasoning=true35.7%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="MiMo-V2.5-Pro":reasoning=trueDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
WildClawBench OpenClawWildClawBench43.0Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro: common questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #25 against #26. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 cheaper than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper on output tokens: $0.87/1M against $1.74/1M. Input tokens are $0.579/1M for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and $0.435/1M for MiMo-V2.5-Pro. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $2.03 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 versus $1.30 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro. MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs 35.7% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Both publish a 1M-token context window.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Arena coding: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 1505, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 1520 — MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads. AA Terminal-Bench 2.1: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 78.7%, MiMo-V2.5-Pro 65.2% — DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads.

Are DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro open-weight models?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Open weights. MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

ModelCap currently lists 19 API providers for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and 7 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further