Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GPT-5.6 Luna

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (DeepSeek) and GPT-5.6 Luna (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#25 vs #28); GPT-5.6 Luna is 1.4× cheaper per output token ($1.20/1M vs $1.74/1M); and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #25 against #28 (73.6 vs 70.5 points).
  • you want to self-host: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 ships open weights while GPT-5.6 Luna is api only.
  • you want provider choice — 19 listed API providers against 3.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1505 against 1497.
  • ARC-AGI-2 is your yardstick — 61.3% against 59.5%.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 41.0% against 39.5%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 was listed 12 August 2026, GPT-5.6 Luna 9 July 2026.

Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…

  • API cost matters — $1.20/1M output tokens against $1.74/1M, about 1.4× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.20/1M against $0.579/1M.
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 37.5 against 36.3.
  • AA Terminal-Bench 2.1 is your yardstick — 80.9% against 78.7%.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GPT-5.6 Luna: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GPT-5.6 Luna
FieldDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeekGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI
ModelCap Index position#25#28
Index score73.670.5
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.579$0.20
Output price / 1M tokens$1.74$1.20
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens393K128K
API providers listed193
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only
Input modalitiesTextFile, Image, Text
First listed12 August 20269 July 2026
PublisherDeepSeekOpenAI

Evidence: 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards · 6 public benchmark observations across 6 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or GPT-5.6 Luna has a published result
BoardDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813GPT-5.6 LunaLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15051490–1519High14971489–1505X-HighDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
LMArena AgentLMArena1.1%0.0%–2.2%X-HighOnly one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation61.3%Max59.5%MaxDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
ARC-AGI-3ARC Prize Foundation0.2%MaxOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis36.3intelligence-index:v4.3:max37.5intelligence-index:v4.3:maxGPT-5.6 Luna
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis78.7%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max)":reasoning=true80.9%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="GPT-5.6 Luna (max)":reasoning=trueGPT-5.6 Luna
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis41.0%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (max)":reasoning=true39.5%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="GPT-5.6 Luna (max)":reasoning=trueDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)17.3%14.4%–20.1%Codex · MaxOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GPT-5.6 Luna: common questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 better than GPT-5.6 Luna?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #25 against #28. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna?

GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper on output tokens: $1.20/1M against $1.74/1M. Input tokens are $0.579/1M for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and $0.20/1M for GPT-5.6 Luna. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $2.03 for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 versus $1.00 for GPT-5.6 Luna. GPT-5.6 Luna costs 50.7% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or GPT-5.6 Luna?

Both publish a 1M-token context window.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 or GPT-5.6 Luna?

Arena coding: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 1505, GPT-5.6 Luna 1497 — DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 leads. AA Terminal-Bench 2.1: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 78.7%, GPT-5.6 Luna 80.9% — GPT-5.6 Luna leads.

Are DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GPT-5.6 Luna open-weight models?

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Open weights. GPT-5.6 Luna: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GPT-5.6 Luna?

ModelCap currently lists 19 API providers for DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and 3 for GPT-5.6 Luna, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GPT-5.6 Luna comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further