Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

GPT-6 Luna vs gpt-oss-120b

GPT-6 Luna (OpenAI) and gpt-oss-120b (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 6 November 2026

As of 6 November 2026, GPT-6 Luna holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#53 vs #164); gpt-oss-120b is 5.7× cheaper per output token ($0.088/1M vs $0.50/1M); GPT-6 Luna offers the longer context window (1M vs 131K tokens); and gpt-oss-120b ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose GPT-6 Luna if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #53 against #164 (67.6 vs 39.6 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 131K.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1441 against 1352.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1506 against 1389.
  • you want the more recently listed model — GPT-6 Luna was listed 22 September 2026, gpt-oss-120b 5 August 2025.

Choose gpt-oss-120b if…

  • API cost matters — $0.088/1M output tokens against $0.50/1M, about 5.7× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.024/1M against $0.10/1M.
  • you want to self-host: gpt-oss-120b ships open weights while GPT-6 Luna is no linked weights.
  • you want provider choice — 22 listed API providers against 3.

GPT-6 Luna vs gpt-oss-120b: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of GPT-6 Luna and gpt-oss-120b
FieldGPT-6 LunaOpenAIgpt-oss-120bOpenAI
ModelCap Index position#53#164
Index score67.639.6
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.10$0.024
Output price / 1M tokens$0.50$0.088
Context window1M tokens131K tokens
Declared route output cap128K66K
API providers listed322
Weight accessNo linked weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesFile, Image, TextText
First listed22 September 20265 August 2025
PublisherOpenAIOpenAI

Evidence: 5 public benchmark observations across 5 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: GPT-6 Luna vs gpt-oss-120b

Public benchmark boards where GPT-6 Luna or gpt-oss-120b has a published result
BoardGPT-6 Lunagpt-oss-120bLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)14411437–1445Max13521347–1356Not reportedGPT-6 Luna
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15061500–1512Max13891381–1397GPT-6 Luna
LMArena AgentLMArena1.9%1.5%–2.3%Max—Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation59.3%Max—Only one result
ARC-AGI-3ARC Prize Foundation0.2%Medium—Only one result
SWE-benchSWE-bench (Princeton / SWE-agent team)—26.0%Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis27.9Max—Only one result
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)16.4%13.6%–19.1%Codex · Max—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

GPT-6 Luna vs gpt-oss-120b: common questions

Is GPT-6 Luna better than gpt-oss-120b?

GPT-6 Luna ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 6 November 2026: #53 against #164. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.

Is GPT-6 Luna cheaper than gpt-oss-120b?

gpt-oss-120b is cheaper on output tokens: $0.088/1M against $0.50/1M. Input tokens are $0.10/1M for GPT-6 Luna and $0.024/1M for gpt-oss-120b. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.45 for GPT-6 Luna versus $0.09 for gpt-oss-120b. gpt-oss-120b costs 79.6% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-6 Luna or gpt-oss-120b?

GPT-6 Luna has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 131K. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, GPT-6 Luna or gpt-oss-120b?

Arena coding: GPT-6 Luna 1506, gpt-oss-120b 1389 — GPT-6 Luna leads.

Are GPT-6 Luna and gpt-oss-120b open-weight models?

GPT-6 Luna: No linked weights. gpt-oss-120b: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run GPT-6 Luna and gpt-oss-120b?

ModelCap currently lists 3 API providers for GPT-6 Luna and 22 for gpt-oss-120b, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this GPT-6 Luna vs gpt-oss-120b comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 6 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further