Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) (OpenAI) and GPT-6.1 Sol (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 2 October 2026

As of 2 October 2026, GPT-6.1 Sol holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#4 vs #166); and GPT-6.1 Sol offers the longer context window (1M vs 128K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose GPT-4o (2024-08-06) if…

  • ModelCap publishes no field on which GPT-4o (2024-08-06) leads GPT-6.1 Sol for this pair.

Choose GPT-6.1 Sol if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #4 against #166 (83.5 vs 37.3 points).
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $2.00/1M against $2.50/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 128K.
  • you want provider choice — 3 listed API providers against 2.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1483 against 1336.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 52.9% against 2.3%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — GPT-6.1 Sol was listed 29 September 2026, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) 6 August 2024.

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs GPT-6.1 Sol: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and GPT-6.1 Sol
FieldGPT-4o (2024-08-06)OpenAIGPT-6.1 SolOpenAI
ModelCap Index position#166#4
Index score37.383.5
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$2.50$2.00
Output price / 1M tokens$10.00$10.00
Context window128K tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap16K128K
API providers listed23
Weight accessNo linked weightsNo linked weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, FileFile, Image, Text
First listed6 August 202429 September 2026
PublisherOpenAIOpenAI

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs GPT-6.1 Sol

Public benchmark boards where GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or GPT-6.1 Sol has a published result
BoardGPT-4o (2024-08-06)GPT-6.1 SolLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)13361331–1340Not reported14831473–1494MaxGPT-6.1 Sol
Arena codingArena (LMArena)13601352–1368—Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation—94.2%MaxOnly one result
ARC-AGI-3ARC Prize Foundation—52.7%MaxOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis—51.8MaxOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis28.9%Non-reasoning—Only one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis2.3%Non-reasoning52.9%MaxGPT-6.1 Sol

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs GPT-6.1 Sol: common questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-08-06) better than GPT-6.1 Sol?

GPT-6.1 Sol ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 2 October 2026: #4 against #166. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.

Is GPT-4o (2024-08-06) cheaper than GPT-6.1 Sol?

Both list the same output price, $10.00/1M tokens, with input at $2.50/1M and $2.00/1M respectively. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $10.00 for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) versus $9.00 for GPT-6.1 Sol. GPT-6.1 Sol costs 10.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or GPT-6.1 Sol?

GPT-6.1 Sol has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 128K. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or GPT-6.1 Sol?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and GPT-6.1 Sol open-weight models?

GPT-4o (2024-08-06): No linked weights. GPT-6.1 Sol: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and GPT-6.1 Sol?

ModelCap currently lists 2 API providers for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and 3 for GPT-6.1 Sol, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs GPT-6.1 Sol comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 2 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further