Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-5.5 Pro

Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral AI) and GPT-5.5 Pro (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 15 September 2026

As of 15 September 2026, GPT-5.5 Pro holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#54 vs #63); Mistral Medium 3.5 is 24× cheaper per output token ($7.50/1M vs $180/1M); and GPT-5.5 Pro offers the longer context window (1M vs 262K tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Mistral Medium 3.5 if…

  • API cost matters — $7.50/1M output tokens against $180/1M, about 24× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $1.50/1M against $30.00/1M.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Mistral Medium 3.5 was listed 30 April 2026, GPT-5.5 Pro 24 April 2026.

Choose GPT-5.5 Pro if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #54 against #63 (58.9 vs 55.9 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 262K.

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-5.5 Pro: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Mistral Medium 3.5 and GPT-5.5 Pro
FieldMistral Medium 3.5Mistral AIGPT-5.5 ProOpenAI
ModelCap Index position#63#54
Index score55.958.9
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$1.50$30.00
Output price / 1M tokens$7.50$180
Context window262K tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens210K128K
API providers listed11
Weight accessAPI onlyAPI only
Input modalitiesText, Image, FileFile, Image, Text
First listed30 April 202624 April 2026
PublisherMistral AIOpenAI

Evidence: 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards · publisher-corpus-prior over 193 held-out anchors (61%); 1 specialist-board observation at 2.1% support (39%); shrunk 13.8 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Mistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-5.5 Pro

Public benchmark boards where Mistral Medium 3.5 or GPT-5.5 Pro has a published result
BoardMistral Medium 3.5GPT-5.5 ProLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14791468–1490Only one result
LMArena AgentLMArena-10.3%-11.7%–-8.8%Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation84.6%HighOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis14.9intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis94.2%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Mistral Medium 3.5":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis13.8%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Mistral Medium 3.5":reasoning=trueOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-5.5 Pro: common questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than GPT-5.5 Pro?

GPT-5.5 Pro ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 15 September 2026: #54 against #63. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 cheaper than GPT-5.5 Pro?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper on output tokens: $7.50/1M against $180/1M. Input tokens are $1.50/1M for Mistral Medium 3.5 and $30.00/1M for GPT-5.5 Pro. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $6.75 for Mistral Medium 3.5 versus $150.00 for GPT-5.5 Pro. Mistral Medium 3.5 costs 95.5% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral Medium 3.5 or GPT-5.5 Pro?

GPT-5.5 Pro has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 262K.

Which is better for coding, Mistral Medium 3.5 or GPT-5.5 Pro?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Mistral Medium 3.5 and GPT-5.5 Pro open-weight models?

Mistral Medium 3.5: API only. GPT-5.5 Pro: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Mistral Medium 3.5 and GPT-5.5 Pro?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Mistral Medium 3.5 and 1 for GPT-5.5 Pro, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Mistral Medium 3.5 vs GPT-5.5 Pro comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 15 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further