Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and Mistral Medium 3.5 (Mistral AI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.
Snapshot as of 9 September 2026
As of 9 September 2026, Mistral Medium 3.5 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#56 vs #58); Claude Haiku 4.5 is 1.5× cheaper per output token ($5.00/1M vs $7.50/1M); and Mistral Medium 3.5 offers the longer context window (262K vs 200K tokens).
Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.
Benchmark scores: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Public benchmark boards where Claude Haiku 4.5 or Mistral Medium 3.5 has a published result
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5: common questions
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Mistral Medium 3.5?
Mistral Medium 3.5 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #56 against #58. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 cheaper than Mistral Medium 3.5?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper on output tokens: $5.00/1M against $7.50/1M. Input tokens are $1.00/1M for Claude Haiku 4.5 and $1.50/1M for Mistral Medium 3.5. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $4.50 for Claude Haiku 4.5 versus $6.75 for Mistral Medium 3.5. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs 33.3% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Mistral Medium 3.5?
Mistral Medium 3.5 has the larger context window: 262K tokens against 200K.
Which is better for coding, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Mistral Medium 3.5?
Arena coding: Claude Haiku 4.5 1481, Mistral Medium 3.5 1479 — Claude Haiku 4.5 leads.
Are Claude Haiku 4.5 and Mistral Medium 3.5 open-weight models?
Claude Haiku 4.5: API only. Mistral Medium 3.5: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.
Where can I run Claude Haiku 4.5 and Mistral Medium 3.5?
ModelCap currently lists 4 API providers for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 1 for Mistral Medium 3.5, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.
How current is this Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5 comparison?
Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.