Claude Haiku 4.5 (Anthropic) and Laguna XS 2.1 (Poolside) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.
Snapshot as of 9 September 2026
As of 9 September 2026, Claude Haiku 4.5 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#58 vs #61); Laguna XS 2.1 is 41.7× cheaper per output token ($0.12/1M vs $5.00/1M); and Laguna XS 2.1 offers the longer context window (262K vs 200K tokens).
Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 3 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (30%); global-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (70%); shrunk 1.4 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.
Benchmark scores: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Laguna XS 2.1
Public benchmark boards where Claude Haiku 4.5 or Laguna XS 2.1 has a published result
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Laguna XS 2.1: common questions
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Laguna XS 2.1?
Claude Haiku 4.5 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #58 against #61. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 cheaper than Laguna XS 2.1?
Laguna XS 2.1 is cheaper on output tokens: $0.12/1M against $5.00/1M. Input tokens are $1.00/1M for Claude Haiku 4.5 and $0.06/1M for Laguna XS 2.1. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $4.50 for Claude Haiku 4.5 versus $0.18 for Laguna XS 2.1. Laguna XS 2.1 costs 96.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
Which has the bigger context window, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Laguna XS 2.1?
Laguna XS 2.1 has the larger context window: 262K tokens against 200K.
Which is better for coding, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Laguna XS 2.1?
The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.
Are Claude Haiku 4.5 and Laguna XS 2.1 open-weight models?
Claude Haiku 4.5: API only. Laguna XS 2.1: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.
Where can I run Claude Haiku 4.5 and Laguna XS 2.1?
ModelCap currently lists 4 API providers for Claude Haiku 4.5 and 1 for Laguna XS 2.1, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.
How current is this Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Laguna XS 2.1 comparison?
Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.