Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Laguna XS 2.1

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (DeepSeek) and Laguna XS 2.1 (Poolside) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, Laguna XS 2.1 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#61 vs #62); Laguna XS 2.1 is 8.3× cheaper per output token ($0.12/1M vs $1.00/1M); Laguna XS 2.1 offers the longer context window (262K vs 164K tokens); and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus if…

  • you want to self-host: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus ships open weights while Laguna XS 2.1 is restricted license.
  • you want provider choice — 4 listed API providers against 1.

Choose Laguna XS 2.1 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #61 against #62 (54.1 vs 54.0 points).
  • API cost matters — $0.12/1M output tokens against $1.00/1M, about 8.3× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.06/1M against $0.27/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 262K tokens against 164K.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Laguna XS 2.1 was listed 2 July 2026, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus 22 September 2025.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Laguna XS 2.1: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Laguna XS 2.1
FieldDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeekLaguna XS 2.1Poolside
ModelCap Index position#62#61
Index score54.054.1
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$0.27$0.06
Output price / 1M tokens$1.00$0.12
Context window164K tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens33K33K
API providers listed41
Weight accessOpen weightsRestricted license
Input modalitiesTextText
First listed22 September 20252 July 2026
PublisherDeepSeekPoolside

Evidence: 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards · 3 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (30%); global-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (70%); shrunk 1.4 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Laguna XS 2.1

Public benchmark boards where DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Laguna XS 2.1 has a published result
BoardDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusLaguna XS 2.1Leads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14611438–1485ThinkingOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis15.4intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis44.9%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis37.1%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis8.7%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Laguna XS 2.1: common questions

Is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus better than Laguna XS 2.1?

Laguna XS 2.1 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #61 against #62. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus cheaper than Laguna XS 2.1?

Laguna XS 2.1 is cheaper on output tokens: $0.12/1M against $1.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.27/1M for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and $0.06/1M for Laguna XS 2.1. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.04 for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus versus $0.18 for Laguna XS 2.1. Laguna XS 2.1 costs 82.7% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Laguna XS 2.1?

Laguna XS 2.1 has the larger context window: 262K tokens against 164K.

Which is better for coding, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Laguna XS 2.1?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Laguna XS 2.1 open-weight models?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: Open weights. Laguna XS 2.1: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Laguna XS 2.1?

ModelCap currently lists 4 API providers for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and 1 for Laguna XS 2.1, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Laguna XS 2.1 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further