Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

R1 0528 vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

R1 0528 (DeepSeek) and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (DeepSeek) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 22 September 2026

As of 22 September 2026, R1 0528 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#62 vs #71); and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is 2.2× cheaper per output token ($1.00/1M vs $2.15/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose R1 0528 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #62 against #71 (63.1 vs 61.1 points).
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1464 against 1461.

Choose DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus if…

  • API cost matters — $1.00/1M output tokens against $2.15/1M, about 2.2× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.27/1M against $0.50/1M.
  • you want the more recently listed model — DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus was listed 22 September 2025, R1 0528 28 May 2025.

R1 0528 vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of R1 0528 and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
FieldR1 0528DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeek
ModelCap Index position#62#71
Index score63.161.1
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.50$0.27
Output price / 1M tokens$2.15$1.00
Context window164K tokens164K tokens
Max output tokens33K33K
API providers listed44
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesTextText
First listed28 May 202522 September 2025
PublisherDeepSeekDeepSeek

Evidence: 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: R1 0528 vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

Public benchmark boards where R1 0528 or DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a published result
BoardR1 0528DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14641453–147514611438–1485ThinkingR1 0528
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis14.8intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis37.1%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis8.7%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

R1 0528 vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: common questions

Is R1 0528 better than DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus?

R1 0528 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 22 September 2026: #62 against #71. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is R1 0528 cheaper than DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is cheaper on output tokens: $1.00/1M against $2.15/1M. Input tokens are $0.50/1M for R1 0528 and $0.27/1M for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $2.08 for R1 0528 versus $1.04 for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus costs 49.9% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, R1 0528 or DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus?

Both publish a 164K-token context window.

Which is better for coding, R1 0528 or DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus?

Arena coding: R1 0528 1464, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus 1461 — R1 0528 leads.

Are R1 0528 and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus open-weight models?

R1 0528: Open weights. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run R1 0528 and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus?

ModelCap currently lists 4 API providers for R1 0528 and 4 for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this R1 0528 vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 22 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further