Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Qwen SEA LION v4.5 27B IT vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

Qwen SEA LION v4.5 27B IT (Aisingapore) and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (DeepSeek) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#62 vs #65).

Which should you choose?

Choose Qwen SEA LION v4.5 27B IT if…

  • you want the more recently listed model — Qwen SEA LION v4.5 27B IT was listed 14 May 2026, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus 22 September 2025.

Choose DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #62 against #65 (54.0 vs 52.8 points).
  • you want provider choice — 4 listed API providers against 0.

Qwen SEA LION v4.5 27B IT vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Qwen SEA LION v4.5 27B IT and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
FieldQwen SEA LION v4.5 27B ITAisingaporeDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusDeepSeek
ModelCap Index position#65#62
Index score52.854.0
EvidenceInheritedMeasured
Input price / 1M tokensUnlisted$0.27
Output price / 1M tokensUnlisted$1.00
Context window— tokens164K tokens
Max output tokens33K
API providers listed04
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
First listed14 May 202622 September 2025
PublisherAisingaporeDeepSeek

Evidence: finetune of qwen/qwen3.6-27b · finetune (100%) · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Qwen SEA LION v4.5 27B IT vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

Public benchmark boards where Qwen SEA LION v4.5 27B IT or DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a published result
BoardQwen SEA LION v4.5 27B ITDeepSeek V3.1 TerminusLeads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14611438–1485ThinkingOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis15.4intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1Artificial Analysis44.9%terminal-bench:2.1:terminus-2:e2b:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis37.1%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis8.7%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Qwen SEA LION v4.5 27B IT vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: common questions

Is Qwen SEA LION v4.5 27B IT better than DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus?

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #62 against #65. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Qwen SEA LION v4.5 27B IT cheaper than DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus?

At least one of the two has no listed API price on ModelCap right now, so no price comparison is made.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen SEA LION v4.5 27B IT or DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus?

Both publish a —-token context window.

Which is better for coding, Qwen SEA LION v4.5 27B IT or DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Qwen SEA LION v4.5 27B IT and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus open-weight models?

Qwen SEA LION v4.5 27B IT: Open weights. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Qwen SEA LION v4.5 27B IT and DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus?

ModelCap currently lists 0 API providers for Qwen SEA LION v4.5 27B IT and 4 for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Qwen SEA LION v4.5 27B IT vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further