Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs GPT-5.5 Pro

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (InclusionAI) and GPT-5.5 Pro (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 19 September 2026

As of 19 September 2026, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#55 vs #58); Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 1000× cheaper per output token ($0.18/1M vs $180/1M); GPT-5.5 Pro offers the longer context window (1M vs 262K tokens); and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #55 against #58 (61.0 vs 59.5 points).
  • API cost matters — $0.18/1M output tokens against $180/1M, about 1000× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.06/1M against $30.00/1M.
  • you want to self-host: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ships open weights while GPT-5.5 Pro is api only.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was listed 27 August 2026, GPT-5.5 Pro 24 April 2026.

Choose GPT-5.5 Pro if…

  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 262K.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs GPT-5.5 Pro: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and GPT-5.5 Pro
FieldLing 3.0 Flash FinInclusionAIGPT-5.5 ProOpenAI
ModelCap Index position#55#58
Index score61.059.5
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.06$30.00
Output price / 1M tokens$0.18$180
Context window262K tokens1M tokens
Max output tokens236K128K
API providers listed11
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only
Input modalitiesTextFile, Image, Text
First listed27 August 202624 April 2026
PublisherInclusionAIOpenAI

Evidence: 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board · publisher-corpus-prior over 195 held-out anchors (60%); 1 specialist-board observation at 2.1% support (40%); shrunk 13.2 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs GPT-5.5 Pro

Public benchmark boards where Ling 3.0 Flash Fin or GPT-5.5 Pro has a published result
BoardLing 3.0 Flash FinGPT-5.5 ProLeads
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation84.6%HighOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis22.6intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis22.6%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Ling-3.0-flash-Fin":reasoning=trueOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs GPT-5.5 Pro: common questions

Is Ling 3.0 Flash Fin better than GPT-5.5 Pro?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 19 September 2026: #55 against #58. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Ling 3.0 Flash Fin cheaper than GPT-5.5 Pro?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is cheaper on output tokens: $0.18/1M against $180/1M. Input tokens are $0.06/1M for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and $30.00/1M for GPT-5.5 Pro. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.21 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin versus $150.00 for GPT-5.5 Pro. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs 99.9% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin or GPT-5.5 Pro?

GPT-5.5 Pro has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 262K.

Which is better for coding, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin or GPT-5.5 Pro?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and GPT-5.5 Pro open-weight models?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: Open weights. GPT-5.5 Pro: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and GPT-5.5 Pro?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and 1 for GPT-5.5 Pro, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs GPT-5.5 Pro comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 19 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further