Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

GPT-5.5 Pro vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

GPT-5.5 Pro (OpenAI) and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 (Qwen) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 9 September 2026

As of 9 September 2026, GPT-5.5 Pro holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#49 vs #52); Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 is 204.5× cheaper per output token ($0.88/1M vs $180/1M); GPT-5.5 Pro offers the longer context window (1M vs 262K tokens); and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose GPT-5.5 Pro if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #49 against #52 (59.1 vs 58.0 points).
  • you need the longer context window — 1M tokens against 262K.
  • you want the more recently listed model — GPT-5.5 Pro was listed 24 April 2026, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 21 July 2025.

Choose Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 if…

  • API cost matters — $0.88/1M output tokens against $180/1M, about 204.5× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.22/1M against $30.00/1M.
  • you want to self-host: Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 ships open weights while GPT-5.5 Pro is api only.
  • you want provider choice — 10 listed API providers against 1.

GPT-5.5 Pro vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of GPT-5.5 Pro and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
FieldGPT-5.5 ProOpenAIQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen
ModelCap Index position#49#52
Index score59.158.0
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$30.00$0.22
Output price / 1M tokens$180$0.88
Context window1M tokens262K tokens
Max output tokens128K16K
API providers listed110
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights
Input modalitiesFile, Image, TextText
First listed24 April 202621 July 2025
PublisherOpenAIQwen

Evidence: publisher-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (61%); 1 specialist-board observation at 2.1% support (40%); shrunk 14.6 toward the measured corpus · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: GPT-5.5 Pro vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

Public benchmark boards where GPT-5.5 Pro or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 has a published result
BoardGPT-5.5 ProQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Leads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14721468–1477Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation84.6%HighOnly one result
BFCL V4UC Berkeley (Gorilla)52.2PromptOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis33.3%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="Qwen3 235B 2507 (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis11.1%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Qwen3 235B 2507 (Non-reasoning)":reasoning=falseOnly one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

GPT-5.5 Pro vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507: common questions

Is GPT-5.5 Pro better than Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

GPT-5.5 Pro ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 9 September 2026: #49 against #52. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is GPT-5.5 Pro cheaper than Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 is cheaper on output tokens: $0.88/1M against $180/1M. Input tokens are $30.00/1M for GPT-5.5 Pro and $0.22/1M for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $150.00 for GPT-5.5 Pro versus $0.88 for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs 99.4% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.5 Pro or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

GPT-5.5 Pro has the larger context window: 1M tokens against 262K.

Which is better for coding, GPT-5.5 Pro or Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are GPT-5.5 Pro and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 open-weight models?

GPT-5.5 Pro: API only. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507: Open weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run GPT-5.5 Pro and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for GPT-5.5 Pro and 10 for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this GPT-5.5 Pro vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 9 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further