Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs o3

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (InclusionAI) and o3 (OpenAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 19 September 2026

As of 19 September 2026, o3 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#52 vs #55); Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 44.4× cheaper per output token ($0.18/1M vs $8.00/1M); Ling 3.0 Flash Fin offers the longer context window (262K vs 200K tokens); and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ships open weights.

Which should you choose?

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin if…

  • API cost matters — $0.18/1M output tokens against $8.00/1M, about 44.4× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.06/1M against $2.00/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 262K tokens against 200K.
  • you want to self-host: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ships open weights while o3 is api only.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 22.6% against 20.1%.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was listed 27 August 2026, o3 16 April 2025.

Choose o3 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #52 against #55 (61.7 vs 61.0 points).

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs o3: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and o3
FieldLing 3.0 Flash FinInclusionAIo3OpenAI
ModelCap Index position#55#52
Index score61.061.7
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$0.06$2.00
Output price / 1M tokens$0.18$8.00
Context window262K tokens200K tokens
Max output tokens236K100K
API providers listed11
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only
Input modalitiesTextImage, Text, File
First listed27 August 202616 April 2025
PublisherInclusionAIOpenAI

Evidence: 1 public benchmark observation across 1 board · 3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs o3

Public benchmark boards where Ling 3.0 Flash Fin or o3 has a published result
BoardLing 3.0 Flash Fino3Leads
Arena codingArena (LMArena)14601454–1467Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation6.5%HighOnly one result
SWE-benchSWE-bench (Princeton / SWE-agent team)58.4%Only one result
BFCL V4UC Berkeley (Gorilla)63.1PromptOnly one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis22.6intelligence-index:v4.3:reasoning-unspecifiedOnly one result
AA τ²-Bench TelecomArtificial Analysis80.7%tau2:telecom:dual-control:pass-at-1:3-repeats:source-model="o3":reasoning=trueOnly one result
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis22.6%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="Ling-3.0-flash-Fin":reasoning=true20.1%hle:may-2025:text-only-2158:no-tools:pass-at-1:source-model="o3":reasoning=trueLing 3.0 Flash Fin

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs o3: common questions

Is Ling 3.0 Flash Fin better than o3?

o3 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 19 September 2026: #52 against #55. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Ling 3.0 Flash Fin cheaper than o3?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is cheaper on output tokens: $0.18/1M against $8.00/1M. Input tokens are $0.06/1M for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and $2.00/1M for o3. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.21 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin versus $8.00 for o3. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs 97.4% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin or o3?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin has the larger context window: 262K tokens against 200K.

Which is better for coding, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin or o3?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and o3 open-weight models?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: Open weights. o3: API only. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence; API-only models are available solely through hosted endpoints.

Where can I run Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and o3?

ModelCap currently lists 1 API provider for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and 1 for o3, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs o3 comparison?

Every figure comes from the sealed ModelCap dataset published 19 September 2026; the page re-renders within a minute of each data refresh, and the ModelCap Index positions are the same ones shown on the live rankings.

Explore further