Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent (xAI) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 6 November 2026

As of 6 November 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#1 vs #23); Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is 8× cheaper per output token ($2.50/1M vs $20.00/1M); and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent offers the longer context window (2M vs 1M tokens).

Which should you choose?

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #1 against #23 (87.7 vs 77.9 points).
  • you want provider choice — 5 listed API providers against 1.
  • Arena text is your yardstick — 1509 against 1471.
  • Arena coding is your yardstick — 1551 against 1508.
  • you want the more recently listed model — Claude Opus 5.5 was listed 22 September 2026, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent 31 March 2026.

Choose Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent if…

  • API cost matters — $2.50/1M output tokens against $20.00/1M, about 8× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $1.25/1M against $4.00/1M.
  • you need the longer context window — 2M tokens against 1M.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Claude Opus 5.5 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
FieldClaude Opus 5.5AnthropicGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentxAI
ModelCap Index position#1#23
Index score87.777.9
EvidenceMeasuredMeasured
Input price / 1M tokens$4.00$1.25
Output price / 1M tokens$20.00$2.50
Context window1M tokens2M tokens
Declared route output cap128K1.8M
API providers listed51
Weight accessNo linked weightsNo linked weights
Input modalitiesText, Image, FileText, Image, File
First listed22 September 202631 March 2026
PublisherAnthropicxAI

Evidence: 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards · 2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Public benchmark boards where Claude Opus 5.5 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has a published result
BoardClaude Opus 5.5Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)15091502–1515High14711467–1474Beta · 0309Claude Opus 5.5
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15511538–1563High15081503–1514Beta · 0309Claude Opus 5.5
LMArena AgentLMArena20.1%18.1%–22.2%Max—Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation93.3%High—Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis59.1Max—Only one result
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)64.9%61.7%–68.0%Claude Code · Max—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: common questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Claude Opus 5.5 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 6 November 2026: #1 against #23. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Claude Opus 5.5 cheaper than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper on output tokens: $2.50/1M against $20.00/1M. Input tokens are $4.00/1M for Claude Opus 5.5 and $1.25/1M for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $18.00 for Claude Opus 5.5 versus $3.75 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent costs 79.2% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has the larger context window: 2M tokens against 1M. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 5.5 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Arena coding: Claude Opus 5.5 1551, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent 1508 — Claude Opus 5.5 leads.

Are Claude Opus 5.5 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent open-weight models?

Claude Opus 5.5: No linked weights. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: No linked weights. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Claude Opus 5.5 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

ModelCap currently lists 5 API providers for Claude Opus 5.5 and 1 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 6 November 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further