Skip to content
ModelCap

Head-to-head comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic) and MiniMax M3.1 Flash (MiniMax) compared on the ModelCap Index, API price, context window, provider availability, weight access and every public benchmark board they share. Figures are the same ones shown on the live rankings; nothing here is a hidden score.

Snapshot as of 23 October 2026

As of 23 October 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 holds the stronger ModelCap Index position (#1 vs #22); and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 33.3× cheaper per output token ($0.60/1M vs $20.00/1M).

Which should you choose?

Choose Claude Opus 5.5 if…

  • you want the stronger overall ModelCap Index position — #1 against #22 (87.4 vs 77.4 points).
  • AA Intelligence Index is your yardstick — 57.6 against 42.7.
  • AA Humanity's Last Exam is your yardstick — 61.4% against 48.0%.

Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash if…

  • API cost matters — $0.60/1M output tokens against $20.00/1M, about 33.3× cheaper.
  • your workload is prompt-heavy — input tokens cost $0.15/1M against $4.00/1M.
  • you want the more recently listed model — MiniMax M3.1 Flash was listed 19 October 2026, Claude Opus 5.5 22 September 2026.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash: specs, pricing and context

Specification comparison of Claude Opus 5.5 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash
FieldClaude Opus 5.5AnthropicMiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMax
ModelCap Index position#1#22
Index score87.477.4
EvidenceMeasuredEstimated
Input price / 1M tokens$4.00$0.15
Output price / 1M tokens$20.00$0.60
Context window1M tokens1M tokens
Declared route output cap128K524K
API providers listed55
Weight accessNo linked weightsRestricted license
Input modalitiesText, Image, FileText, Image, Video
First listed22 September 202619 October 2026
PublisherAnthropicMiniMax

Evidence: 4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards · publisher-corpus-prior over 211 held-out anchors (6%); launch card against 5 resolved peers on 6 rows (94%); optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 1.9 toward the measured corpus. Prices are the lowest listed API offer per million tokens observed on the OpenRouter catalogue.

Benchmark scores: Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Public benchmark boards where Claude Opus 5.5 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash has a published result
BoardClaude Opus 5.5MiniMax M3.1 FlashLeads
Arena textArena (LMArena)15091502–1516High—Only one result
Arena codingArena (LMArena)15481535–1561High—Only one result
LMArena AgentLMArena20.9%18.4%–23.4%Max—Only one result
ARC-AGI-2ARC Prize Foundation93.3%High—Only one result
AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis57.6Reasoning42.7ReasoningClaude Opus 5.5
AA Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis61.4%Reasoning48.0%ReasoningClaude Opus 5.5
Terminal-Bench 4.0Terminal-Bench (Laude Institute)64.9%61.7%–68.0%Claude Code · Max—Only one result

Scores are the sources' own published figures for each model's best evaluated configuration; ModelCap never re-runs a benchmark.

Want a different pairing? Open the interactive comparison tool to swap either model for any current ranked language model.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash: common questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Claude Opus 5.5 ranks higher on the ModelCap Index as of 23 October 2026: #1 against #22. That is a capability ranking built from public benchmark evidence with published uncertainty; whether it is "better" for you also depends on price, context and where you can run it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.

Is Claude Opus 5.5 cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is cheaper on output tokens: $0.60/1M against $20.00/1M. Input tokens are $4.00/1M for Claude Opus 5.5 and $0.15/1M for MiniMax M3.1 Flash. Prices are the lowest listed API offer ModelCap observed, in USD per million tokens. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $18.00 for Claude Opus 5.5 versus $0.60 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash. MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs 96.7% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.

Which has the bigger context window, Claude Opus 5.5 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Both publish a 1M-token context window. OpenRouter catalogue or provider-endpoint declaration. Limits can vary by provider and prompt length; a model-wide maximum has not been independently verified.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 5.5 or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

The two models do not share a coding benchmark board on ModelCap yet, so no head-to-head coding score is published; the ModelCap Index position is the closest overall signal.

Are Claude Opus 5.5 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash open-weight models?

Claude Opus 5.5: No linked weights. MiniMax M3.1 Flash: Restricted license. Open weights mean the checkpoint can be downloaded and self-hosted under its licence. A missing weight link does not identify every API or chat product that offers a model.

Where can I run Claude Opus 5.5 and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

ModelCap currently lists 5 API providers for Claude Opus 5.5 and 5 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash, from the OpenRouter catalogue snapshot the site serves; each model page lists the providers and their prices.

How current is this Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash comparison?

Every figure and ModelCap Index position comes from the same published snapshot dated 23 October 2026. Publication and page updates happen separately; use the snapshot date shown on the page.

Explore further