Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with GLM 4.6V and GLM 5 Turbo, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
GLM 4.6V vs GLM 5 Turbo
Live dataset updated 10/2/2026, 10:19:09 AM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | GLM 4.6V Z.ai | GLM 5 Turbo Z.ai |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #122 | #109 |
| Index score | 49.0 | 53.5 |
| Evidence | Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards | Measuredpublisher-corpus-prior over 231 held-out anchors (63%); 1 specialist-board observation at 1.2% support (37%); shrunk 24.7 up toward the measured corpus |
| Input / 1M | $0.30 | $1.20 |
| Output / 1M | $0.90 | $4.00 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 131K | 203K |
| Providers | 2 | 1 |
| Weight access | Open weights | API only |
Decision facts
- GLM 4.6V is #122; GLM 5 Turbo is #109 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 49.0 for GLM 4.6V and 53.5 for GLM 5 Turbo. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Both positions use Measured evidence.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.90 for GLM 4.6V and $4.00 for GLM 5 Turbo. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.05 for GLM 4.6V versus $4.40 for GLM 5 Turbo. GLM 4.6V costs 76.1% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 131,072 tokens for GLM 4.6V and 202,752 for GLM 5 Turbo.
- Weight access differs: GLM 4.6V is open; GLM 5 Turbo is none.
- ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for GLM 4.6V and 1 for GLM 5 Turbo.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5#2 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#2 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5#4 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5#4 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#4 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#5 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6.1 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#5 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#4 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#5 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.