Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with GLM 4.6V and GLM 5 Turbo, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

GLM 4.6V vs GLM 5 Turbo

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of GLM 4.6V and GLM 5 Turbo
Field
ModelCap position#77#39
Index score33.355.0
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M$0.30$1.20
Output / 1M$0.90$4.00
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context131K203K
Providers21
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only

Decision facts

  • GLM 4.6V is #77; GLM 5 Turbo is #39 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 33.3 for GLM 4.6V and 55.0 for GLM 5 Turbo.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.90 for GLM 4.6V and $4.00 for GLM 5 Turbo.
  • Published context is 131,072 tokens for GLM 4.6V and 202,752 for GLM 5 Turbo.
  • Weight access differs: GLM 4.6V is open; GLM 5 Turbo is none.
  • ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for GLM 4.6V and 1 for GLM 5 Turbo.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.