Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with GLM 4.5 Air and GLM 5.3, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
GLM 4.5 Air vs GLM 5.3
Live dataset updated 10/2/2026, 11:14:31 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | GLM 4.5 Air Z.ai | GLM 5.3 Z.ai |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #125 | #11 |
| Index score | 46.7 | 80.0 |
| Evidence | Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards | Measured4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards |
| Input / 1M | $0.13 | $1.40 |
| Output / 1M | $0.85 | $4.40 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 131K | 1M |
| Providers | 3 | 32 |
| Weight access | Open weights | Restricted license |
Decision facts
- GLM 4.5 Air is #125; GLM 5.3 is #11 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 46.7 for GLM 4.5 Air and 80.0 for GLM 5.3. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
- Both positions use Measured evidence.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.85 for GLM 4.5 Air and $4.40 for GLM 5.3. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.69 for GLM 4.5 Air versus $5.00 for GLM 5.3. GLM 4.5 Air costs 86.3% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 131,072 tokens for GLM 4.5 Air and 1,048,576 for GLM 5.3.
- Weight access differs: GLM 4.5 Air is open; GLM 5.3 is restricted.
- ModelCap currently lists 3 providers for GLM 4.5 Air and 32 for GLM 5.3.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5#2 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#5 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#5 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra#5 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#2 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6.1 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#4 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#5 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#6 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#8 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.