Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with UI Mate 9B and Falcon H1 34B Instruct, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

UI Mate 9B vs Falcon H1 34B Instruct

Live dataset updated 9/15/2026, 5:33:33 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of UI Mate 9B and Falcon H1 34B Instruct
Field
UI Mate 9B

Tencent

ModelCap position#116#119
Index score39.738.8
EvidenceInheritedfinetune of qwen/qwen3.5-9b · finetune (100%)Estimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 187 held-out anchors (46%); launch card against 5 resolved peers on 11 rows (54%); exceeds every named peer on 3 of 11 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 11.1 up toward the measured corpus
Input / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Output / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Pricing statusunavailableunavailable
Context
Providers00
Weight accessOpen weightsRestricted license

Decision facts

  • UI Mate 9B is #116; Falcon H1 34B Instruct is #119 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 39.7 for UI Mate 9B and 38.8 for Falcon H1 34B Instruct. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: UI Mate 9B is Inherited; Falcon H1 34B Instruct is Estimated.
  • Weight access differs: UI Mate 9B is open; Falcon H1 34B Instruct is restricted.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.