Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Qwen3 Coder Next and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Qwen3 Coder Next and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Field
ModelCap position#85#190
Index score27.612.4
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M$0.12$0.13
Output / 1M$0.80$0.52
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K262K
Providers44
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Qwen3 Coder Next is #85; Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is #190 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 27.6 for Qwen3 Coder Next and 12.4 for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.80 for Qwen3 Coder Next and $0.52 for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Qwen3 Coder Next and 262,144 for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.