Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Qwen3.8 Flash and UI Mate 27B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Qwen3.8 Flash vs UI Mate 27B
Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 8:46:14 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Qwen3.8 Flash Qwen | UI Mate 27B Tencent |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #69 | #67 |
| Index score | 52.8 | 52.8 |
| Evidence | Estimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (19%); measured predecessor qwen/qwen3.5-flash-02-23 less the succession penalty (65%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 9 rows (16%); exceeds every named peer on 7 of 9 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 0.7 toward the measured corpus | Inheritedfinetune of qwen/qwen3.6-27b · finetune (100%) |
| Input / 1M | $0.15 | Unavailable |
| Output / 1M | $0.47 | Unavailable |
| Pricing status | fresh | unavailable |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Providers | 2 | 0 |
| Weight access | Restricted license | Open weights |
Decision facts
- Qwen3.8 Flash is #69; UI Mate 27B is #67 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 52.8 for Qwen3.8 Flash and 52.8 for UI Mate 27B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: Qwen3.8 Flash is Estimated; UI Mate 27B is Inherited.
- Weight access differs: Qwen3.8 Flash is restricted; UI Mate 27B is open.
- ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for Qwen3.8 Flash and 0 for UI Mate 27B.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#4 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#4 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#5 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-6 Astra#6 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra#7 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#7 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#4 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Kimi K3#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs GLM 5.3#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GLM 5.3#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5.3#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.