Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Ornith 1.5 397B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Ornith 1.5 397B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 8:46:14 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Ornith 1.5 397B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Field
ModelCap position#19#21
Index score75.672.8
EvidenceEstimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (12%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 11 rows (88%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 11 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 3 toward the measured corpusMeasured5 public benchmark observations across 5 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.435
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.87
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context1M
Providers07
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Ornith 1.5 397B is #19; MiMo-V2.5-Pro is #21 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 75.6 for Ornith 1.5 397B and 72.8 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: Ornith 1.5 397B is Estimated; MiMo-V2.5-Pro is Measured.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for Ornith 1.5 397B and 7 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.