Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Ornith 1.5 397B and Grok 4.7, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

First modelSecond model

Current public data

Ornith 1.5 397B vs Grok 4.7

Live dataset updated 9/22/2026, 1:40:35 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt

Factual comparison of Ornith 1.5 397B and Grok 4.7
Field	Ornith 1.5 397B Ornith Ai	Grok 4.7 xAI
ModelCap position	#23	#4
Index score	77.1	85.0
Evidence	Estimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 202 held-out anchors (11%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 11 rows (89%); exceeds every named peer on 3 of 11 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 2.7 toward the measured corpus	Measured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M	Unavailable	$1.60
Output / 1M	Unavailable	$4.80
Pricing status	unavailable	fresh
Context	—	500K
Providers	0	1
Weight access	Open weights	API only

Decision facts

Ornith 1.5 397B is #23; Grok 4.7 is #4 on the same current language board.
Index scores are 77.1 for Ornith 1.5 397B and 85.0 for Grok 4.7. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
Evidence differs: Ornith 1.5 397B is Estimated; Grok 4.7 is Measured.
Weight access differs: Ornith 1.5 397B is open; Grok 4.7 is none.
ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for Ornith 1.5 397B and 1 for Grok 4.7.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Popular comparisons

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.