Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with GPT-4o-mini and GPT-6.1 Sol, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
GPT-4o-mini vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Live dataset updated 9/30/2026, 8:54:24 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | GPT-4o-mini OpenAI | GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #158 | #3 |
| Index score | 39.1 | 88.2 |
| Evidence | Measuredpublisher-corpus-prior over 230 held-out anchors (59%); 1 specialist-board observation at 2.1% support (41%); shrunk 26.9 up toward the measured corpus | Measured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards |
| Input / 1M | $0.15 | $2.00 |
| Output / 1M | $0.60 | $10.00 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Providers | 2 | 2 |
| Weight access | API only | API only |
Decision facts
- GPT-4o-mini is #158; GPT-6.1 Sol is #3 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 39.1 for GPT-4o-mini and 88.2 for GPT-6.1 Sol. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
- Both positions use Measured evidence.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.60 for GPT-4o-mini and $10.00 for GPT-6.1 Sol. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.60 for GPT-4o-mini versus $9.00 for GPT-6.1 Sol. GPT-4o-mini costs 93.3% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 128,000 tokens for GPT-4o-mini and 1,050,000 for GPT-6.1 Sol.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5#2 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#2 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5#4 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5#4 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#4 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6.1 Sol#5 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#5 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#2 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#4 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#5 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#6 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6.1 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.