Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Nemotron 3 Super and gpt-oss-120b, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Nemotron 3 Super vs gpt-oss-120b
Live dataset updated 9/15/2026, 7:09:11 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA | gpt-oss-120b OpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #120 | #125 |
| Index score | 37.8 | 34.8 |
| Evidence | Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards | Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards |
| Input / 1M | $0.08 | $0.037 |
| Output / 1M | $0.45 | $0.17 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 262K | 131K |
| Providers | 2 | 20 |
| Weight access | Restricted license | Open weights |
Decision facts
- Nemotron 3 Super is #120; gpt-oss-120b is #125 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 37.8 for Nemotron 3 Super and 34.8 for gpt-oss-120b. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Both positions use Measured evidence.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.45 for Nemotron 3 Super and $0.17 for gpt-oss-120b. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.39 for Nemotron 3 Super versus $0.16 for gpt-oss-120b. gpt-oss-120b costs 58.7% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 262,144 tokens for Nemotron 3 Super and 131,072 for gpt-oss-120b.
- Weight access differs: Nemotron 3 Super is restricted; gpt-oss-120b is open.
- ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for Nemotron 3 Super and 20 for gpt-oss-120b.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#2 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#5 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Muse Spark 1.3#5 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-6 Astra#5 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#4 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs GPT-5.6 Sol#5 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Kimi K3#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.