Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Nex-N2.5-Mini and GPT-5.4 Mini, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Nex-N2.5-Mini vs GPT-5.4 Mini
Live dataset updated 9/10/2026, 1:00:55 AM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Nex-N2.5-Mini Nex AGI | GPT-5.4 Mini OpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #30 | #32 |
| Index score | 68.0 | 66.8 |
| Evidence | Estimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 183 held-out anchors (15%); launch card against 6 resolved peers on 3 rows (85%); no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 2.5 toward the measured corpus | Measured4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards |
| Input / 1M | Free | $0.75 |
| Output / 1M | Free | $4.50 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 262K | 400K |
| Providers | 1 | 2 |
| Weight access | Open weights | API only |
Decision facts
- Nex-N2.5-Mini is #30; GPT-5.4 Mini is #32 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 68.0 for Nex-N2.5-Mini and 66.8 for GPT-5.4 Mini. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: Nex-N2.5-Mini is Estimated; GPT-5.4 Mini is Measured.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0 for Nex-N2.5-Mini and $4.50 for GPT-5.4 Mini. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0 for Nex-N2.5-Mini versus $3.75 for GPT-5.4 Mini. Nex-N2.5-Mini costs 100.0% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 262,144 tokens for Nex-N2.5-Mini and 400,000 for GPT-5.4 Mini.
- Weight access differs: Nex-N2.5-Mini is open; GPT-5.4 Mini is none.
- ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Nex-N2.5-Mini and 2 for GPT-5.4 Mini.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#4 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#4 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#5 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-6 Astra#6 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra#7 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#7 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#4 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Kimi K3#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs GLM 5.3#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GLM 5.3#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5.3#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.