Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Nanbeige4.1 3B and MiniCPM5 2B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Nanbeige4.1 3B vs MiniCPM5 2B

Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 10:25:31 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Nanbeige4.1 3B and MiniCPM5 2B
Field
ModelCap position#93#94
Index score43.543.3
EvidenceEstimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 183 held-out anchors (19%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 6 rows (81%); exceeds every named peer on 5 of 6 rows; optimism haircut 3 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 2.3 up toward the measured corpusMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Output / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Pricing statusunavailableunavailable
Context
Providers00
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Nanbeige4.1 3B is #93; MiniCPM5 2B is #94 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 43.5 for Nanbeige4.1 3B and 43.3 for MiniCPM5 2B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: Nanbeige4.1 3B is Estimated; MiniCPM5 2B is Measured.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.