Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Mistral Small 4 and GLM 5 Turbo, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Mistral Small 4 vs GLM 5 Turbo
Live dataset updated 9/22/2026, 1:40:35 AM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Mistral Small 4 Mistral AI | GLM 5 Turbo Z.ai |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #89 | #88 |
| Index score | 52.7 | 53.0 |
| Evidence | Measured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board | Measuredpublisher-corpus-prior over 202 held-out anchors (65%); 1 specialist-board observation at 1.2% support (35%); shrunk 24.2 up toward the measured corpus |
| Input / 1M | $0.15 | $1.20 |
| Output / 1M | $0.60 | $4.00 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 262K | 203K |
| Providers | 1 | 1 |
| Weight access | Open weights | API only |
Decision facts
- Mistral Small 4 is #89; GLM 5 Turbo is #88 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 52.7 for Mistral Small 4 and 53.0 for GLM 5 Turbo. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Both positions use Measured evidence.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.60 for Mistral Small 4 and $4.00 for GLM 5 Turbo. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.60 for Mistral Small 4 versus $4.40 for GLM 5 Turbo. Mistral Small 4 costs 86.4% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 262,144 tokens for Mistral Small 4 and 202,752 for GLM 5 Turbo.
- Weight access differs: Mistral Small 4 is open; GLM 5 Turbo is none.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.7#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Grok 4.7#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.7#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#6 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Grok 4.7#6 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#2 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Grok 4.7#7 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#6 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#8 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.