Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with MiniMax M1 80k and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

MiniMax M1 80k vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 8:46:14 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of MiniMax M1 80k and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Field
ModelCap position#86#85
Index score45.946.0
EvidenceEstimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (8%); launch card against 5 resolved peers on 9 rows (92%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 9 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 0.7 up toward the measured corpusMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.30
Output / 1MUnavailable$1.00
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context1M262K
Providers05
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • MiniMax M1 80k is #86; Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is #85 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 45.9 for MiniMax M1 80k and 46.0 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: MiniMax M1 80k is Estimated; Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B is Measured.
  • Published context is 1,000,000 tokens for MiniMax M1 80k and 262,144 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for MiniMax M1 80k and 5 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.