Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with MiniMax M1 80k and GPT-5.4 Nano, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

MiniMax M1 80k vs GPT-5.4 Nano

Live dataset updated 9/10/2026, 1:00:55 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of MiniMax M1 80k and GPT-5.4 Nano
Field
ModelCap position#74#76
Index score50.950.5
EvidenceEstimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 183 held-out anchors (19%); launch card against 5 resolved peers on 9 rows (81%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 9 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 0.6 up toward the measured corpusMeasured4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.20
Output / 1MUnavailable$1.25
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context1M400K
Providers02
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only

Decision facts

  • MiniMax M1 80k is #74; GPT-5.4 Nano is #76 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 50.9 for MiniMax M1 80k and 50.5 for GPT-5.4 Nano. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: MiniMax M1 80k is Estimated; GPT-5.4 Nano is Measured.
  • Published context is 1,000,000 tokens for MiniMax M1 80k and 400,000 for GPT-5.4 Nano.
  • Weight access differs: MiniMax M1 80k is open; GPT-5.4 Nano is none.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for MiniMax M1 80k and 2 for GPT-5.4 Nano.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.