Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with MiniMax M3 and Ornith 1.5 35B A3B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

MiniMax M3 vs Ornith 1.5 35B A3B

Live dataset updated 9/10/2026, 6:20:44 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of MiniMax M3 and Ornith 1.5 35B A3B
Field
MiniMax M3

MiniMax

ModelCap position#38#36
Index score65.866.2
EvidenceMeasured4 public benchmark observations across 4 boardsEstimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 185 held-out anchors (22%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 10 rows (78%); exceeds every named peer on 10 of 10 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 3.6 toward the measured corpus
Input / 1M$0.30Unavailable
Output / 1M$1.20Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context1M—
Providers120
Weight accessRestricted licenseOpen weights

Decision facts

  • MiniMax M3 is #38; Ornith 1.5 35B A3B is #36 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 65.8 for MiniMax M3 and 66.2 for Ornith 1.5 35B A3B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: MiniMax M3 is Measured; Ornith 1.5 35B A3B is Estimated.
  • Weight access differs: MiniMax M3 is restricted; Ornith 1.5 35B A3B is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 12 providers for MiniMax M3 and 0 for Ornith 1.5 35B A3B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.