Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Fara1.5 9B and Phi 4, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Fara1.5 9B vs Phi 4

Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 8:46:14 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Fara1.5 9B and Phi 4
Field
Fara1.5 9B

Microsoft

Phi 4

Microsoft

ModelCap position#102#153
Index score39.912.5
EvidenceInheritedfinetune of qwen/qwen3.5-9b · finetune (100%)Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.07
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.14
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context16K
Providers01
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Fara1.5 9B is #102; Phi 4 is #153 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 39.9 for Fara1.5 9B and 12.5 for Phi 4. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
  • Evidence differs: Fara1.5 9B is Inherited; Phi 4 is Measured.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for Fara1.5 9B and 1 for Phi 4.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.