Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Muse Glimmer 30B and MiniMax M3, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Muse Glimmer 30B vs MiniMax M3
Live dataset updated 9/22/2026, 1:40:35 AM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Muse Glimmer 30B Meta | MiniMax M3 MiniMax |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #33 | #36 |
| Index score | 69.6 | 68.1 |
| Evidence | Measuredpublisher-corpus-prior over 202 held-out anchors (25%); 1 specialist-board observation at 1.2% support (13%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 12 rows (63%); exceeds every named peer on 6 of 12 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 4.2 up toward the measured corpus | Measured4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards |
| Input / 1M | $0.30 | $0.30 |
| Output / 1M | $1.20 | $1.20 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 131K | 1M |
| Providers | 4 | 13 |
| Weight access | Open weights | Restricted license |
Decision facts
- Muse Glimmer 30B is #33; MiniMax M3 is #36 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 69.6 for Muse Glimmer 30B and 68.1 for MiniMax M3. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Both positions use Measured evidence.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $1.20 for Muse Glimmer 30B and $1.20 for MiniMax M3. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $1.20 for Muse Glimmer 30B versus $1.20 for MiniMax M3. The listed-rate totals are equal. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 131,072 tokens for Muse Glimmer 30B and 1,048,576 for MiniMax M3.
- Weight access differs: Muse Glimmer 30B is open; MiniMax M3 is restricted.
- ModelCap currently lists 4 providers for Muse Glimmer 30B and 13 for MiniMax M3.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.7#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Grok 4.7#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.7#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#6 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Grok 4.7#6 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#2 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Grok 4.7#7 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#6 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#8 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.