Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with LongCat Flash Chat and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

LongCat Flash Chat vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Live dataset updated 9/15/2026, 7:09:11 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of LongCat Flash Chat and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Field
LongCat Flash Chat

Meituan Longcat

ModelCap position#76#65
Index score53.955.7
EvidenceEstimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 176 held-out anchors (9%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 12 rows (91%); exceeds every named peer on 2 of 12 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 0.1 toward the measured corpusMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.21
Output / 1MUnavailable$1.90
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—262K
Providers05
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • LongCat Flash Chat is #76; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is #65 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 53.9 for LongCat Flash Chat and 55.7 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: LongCat Flash Chat is Estimated; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is Measured.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for LongCat Flash Chat and 5 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.