Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with EXAONE 4.0.1 32B and GPT-4o-mini, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

EXAONE 4.0.1 32B vs GPT-4o-mini

Live dataset updated 9/15/2026, 7:09:11 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of EXAONE 4.0.1 32B and GPT-4o-mini
Field
EXAONE 4.0.1 32B

LGAI EXAONE

ModelCap position#118#123
Index score38.235.7
EvidenceEstimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 176 held-out anchors (15%); launch card against 8 resolved peers on 8 rows (85%); optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 2.6 up toward the measured corpusMeasuredpublisher-corpus-prior over 176 held-out anchors (61%); 1 specialist-board observation at 2.1% support (39%); shrunk 22.1 up toward the measured corpus
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.15
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.60
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—128K
Providers02
Weight accessRestricted licenseAPI only

Decision facts

  • EXAONE 4.0.1 32B is #118; GPT-4o-mini is #123 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 38.2 for EXAONE 4.0.1 32B and 35.7 for GPT-4o-mini. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: EXAONE 4.0.1 32B is Estimated; GPT-4o-mini is Measured.
  • Weight access differs: EXAONE 4.0.1 32B is restricted; GPT-4o-mini is none.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for EXAONE 4.0.1 32B and 2 for GPT-4o-mini.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.