Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Ling 3.0 tiny and GLM 4.5 Air, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Ling 3.0 tiny vs GLM 4.5 Air

Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 8:46:14 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Ling 3.0 tiny and GLM 4.5 Air
Field
Ling 3.0 tiny

InclusionAI

ModelCap position#95#94
Index score41.741.8
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.13
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.85
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—131K
Providers03
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Ling 3.0 tiny is #95; GLM 4.5 Air is #94 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 41.7 for Ling 3.0 tiny and 41.8 for GLM 4.5 Air. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for Ling 3.0 tiny and 3 for GLM 4.5 Air.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.