Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Ling 3.0 Flash and Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Ling 3.0 Flash vs Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B
Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 8:46:14 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Ling 3.0 Flash InclusionAI | |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #82 | #83 |
| Index score | 47.3 | 46.8 |
| Evidence | Estimated5 reported rows against measured corpus ladders (56%); publisher-corpus-prior over 182 held-out anchors (44%); shrunk 1.6 toward the measured corpus | Inheritedfinetune of qwen/qwen3.5-35b-a3b · finetune (100%) |
| Input / 1M | $0.021 | Unavailable |
| Output / 1M | $0.063 | Unavailable |
| Pricing status | fresh | unavailable |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Providers | 2 | 0 |
| Weight access | Open weights | Restricted license |
Decision facts
- Ling 3.0 Flash is #82; Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B is #83 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 47.3 for Ling 3.0 Flash and 46.8 for Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: Ling 3.0 Flash is Estimated; Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B is Inherited.
- Weight access differs: Ling 3.0 Flash is open; Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B is restricted.
- ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for Ling 3.0 Flash and 0 for Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#4 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#4 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#5 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-6 Astra#6 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra#7 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#7 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#4 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Kimi K3#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs GLM 5.3#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GLM 5.3#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5.3#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.