Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

First modelSecond model

Current public data

K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Live dataset updated 9/10/2026, 6:20:44 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt

Factual comparison of K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Field	K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B IFM	Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen
ModelCap position	#70	#68
Index score	53.1	54.0
Evidence	Estimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 185 held-out anchors (64%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 8 rows (36%); exceeds every named peer on 2 of 8 rows; optimism haircut 1.82 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 0.7 up toward the measured corpus	Measured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1M	Unavailable	$0.26
Output / 1M	Unavailable	$2.08
Pricing status	unavailable	fresh
Context	—	262K
Providers	0	5
Weight access	Open weights	Open weights

Decision facts

K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B is #70; Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is #68 on the same current language board.
Index scores are 53.1 for K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B and 54.0 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
Evidence differs: K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B is Estimated; Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is Measured.
ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for K2 Horizon MoVA 36B A4B and 5 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Popular comparisons

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.